Why should Britain bomb Syria? Why should Turkey attack Islamic State Militants?
The problem in this world today is that we have an anarchistic chaos of political groups and institutions; each one a law unto themselves. Islamic State, for example, does what it wants irrespective of who suffers as a consequence. We saw the same thing happening in Saddam Husseins reign of tyranny in Iraq. Other countries haplessly caught up in this anarchistic chaos, have both to shudder at the consequences of doing nothing to contain and control the wild and reckless activities of such regimes, and also to shudder at the possible consequences of taking action against such regimes.
Turkey for example, having struck out at Islamic state, immediately had to approach NATO for protection from reprisals arising from that striking out. Other countries including Britain, must be acutely aware that such vigilante policing of international affairs carries with it the setting up of themselves as targets for reprisals the countries that undertake such self-appointed policing.
There is also the matter of the motive behind such vigilante actions on the part of any country or countries. There is no doubt at all that the main motive for America and the Uks vigilante policing of Iraq at the beginning of this century was motivated purely by the desire to retain control of Iraqs oil, so the question has to be raised also: In an anarchistic chaos where the only control of any government or regime is vigilante action on the part of another government or regime, who is going to police the vigilantes?
The system of international defence and control that is proposed in this website, does away both with the need for any nation to take on the responsibility for dealing with the unacceptable behaviour of any other nation or institution, and with it the incurring of any risks of reprisal and retribution, and also at the same time, prevents any such nation from acting in a rapacious and self-serving way, under the guise of dealing with alleged unacceptable behaviour on the part of their intended victims. Thus the anarchistic chaos that presides over international affairs today is brought under civilised control by a truly independent and altruistic universal authority - and about time too.
We believe that within this website lies the only solution to the creation of World Peace
So far, nobody has shown us to the contrary
You may not have time to read all this website in one go. Why not save it to file or add it to favourites?
Welcome to Worldpeace.org.uk
|The World's Problems||Introduction||Your say|
|Facts and Figures||1) First things First||What can we do to help?|
|2) Plan for Peace||Program for Peace|
|3) The Status Quo|
|Jihad and Armageddon||4) The Crucial Point|
|5) The Set up|
|6) Making it Happen|
|7) Cases in Hand|
|Sword of Peace||A Better Way||Is Blue the Colour of Peace in Palestine?|
|U.N.Contacts||List of M.E.P's||Contacts for Africa|
The World's Problems
No-one can solve all the world's problems. To try would be to dissipate one's energies and achieve nothing. The best thing we can do is to focus all our efforts and attention on just one problem and hope our endeavours will make a difference to it. That immediately creates the dilemma of which particular problem to solve. It may be a matter of personal preference, or it may be a matter of perceived priority. Given that the best way to solve a large number of problems is to solve one at a time, which one of the following major international problems would you choose to resolve first?